[Catalyst-dev] Re: RFC, docs reorg, again
Aristotle Pagaltzis
pagaltzis at gmx.de
Sun Apr 27 16:31:14 BST 2008
* Jonathan Rockway <jon at jrock.us> [2008-04-27 10:10]:
> * On Sat, Apr 26 2008, Kieren Diment wrote:
> > Please consider this idea:
> >
> > Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everhthing that's not
> > the tutorial back into Catalyst::Devel, and make a separate
> > Catalyst::Manual::Tutorial dist.
> >
> > Votes please.
>
> -1. We don't want doc fixes to have any relationship to
> bugfixes. Changing the version number of the dist just to fix
> typos is a bad idea.
I would agree if we were talking about Catalyst::Runtime.
Stability is crucial for that distro. But I don’t know that
Catalyst::Devel needs to be stable to the same extent.
Personally, I like the idea. Then Task::Catalyst::Tutorial
could be rolled into Catalyst::Manual::Tutorial also.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
More information about the Catalyst-dev
mailing list