[Catalyst-dev] Developing action_uri() for Catalyst 5.80

[Jason Gottshall]

On Friday, June 06, 2008 5:19 PM, Ash Berlin <ash_cpan at firemirror.com>
wrote:

> Oh and make sure that if you pass an invalid path, number
> of captures or args that you die with an error rather than just
> blowing up. Returning undef is more hassle than its worth IMO.

You're referring to the fact that uri_for() returns undef in these
situations? So action_uri() should include a re-implementation of the
underlying logic of uri_for() rather than delegating to it. Am I
interpreting that correctly?

Jason