[Catalyst] More complex Class::DBI::Sweet usage?
sri at oook.de
Fri Jul 1 19:12:28 CEST 2005
Am 01.07.2005 um 16:44 schrieb Andreas Marienborg:
> On 1. jul. 2005, at 16.32, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:06 +0100, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>>> This is where the confusion occured - since everything uses
>>> I figured I should be naming my packages under the "Model"
>>> namespace, rather
>>> than the "M" namespace. I knew aliases existed so you can access
>>> things via
>>> either method, but I figured that the actual packages themselves
>>> should be
>>> "model" and the "m" version was the alias - not the other way round!
>> Several people on the list (see the CRUD discussion) seem to have
>> tripped up by this. I'd suggest either dropping the aliasing
>> feature or
>> documenting the places where you should say M and where you should
>> very carefully.
>> - Perrin
> The way I do it is to just choose one, then stick to it. AFAIK they
> arent aliases per se, just two different namespaces, used for the
> same thing. I prefer just using M everywhere, and have never had
> problems with stuff like this.
Exactly! No aliases, just namespaces.
Most people prefered the short version, so it's the default, thats
More information about the Catalyst