[Catalyst] Why Catalyst instead of Ruby on Rails?

[Jules Bean]

Jake wrote:
> Apache may be the best but it isn't the fastest -- even in recently version.
>
> Has anyone considered building a really fast HTTP server into
> Catalyst? I don't think Rails has that, does it?
>   


I'd be *really* surprised if apache was anything like the bottleneck for 
typical catalyst sites. I'm prepared to be proved wrong, but I strongly 
doubt it...

Jules