[Catalyst] Why Catalyst instead of Ruby on Rails?

[Sebastian Riedel]

Am 14.11.2005 um 13:19 schrieb Jules Bean:

> Jake wrote:
>> Apache may be the best but it isn't the fastest -- even in  
>> recently version.
>>
>> Has anyone considered building a really fast HTTP server into
>> Catalyst? I don't think Rails has that, does it?
>>
>
>
> I'd be *really* surprised if apache was anything like the  
> bottleneck for typical catalyst sites. I'm prepared to be proved  
> wrong, but I strongly doubt it...

Experience shows it's *always* the db/orm.
The fastest server/engine combination was lighttpd/fastcgi if i  
remember right.


--
sebastian