[Catalyst] New default screen for Catalyst.
chisel at herlpacker.co.uk
Wed Oct 19 10:39:22 CEST 2005
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:37:54AM -0700, John Wang wrote:
> > It's currently considered EXPERIMENTAL - bring this near a
> > production database at your own risk!
> Someone who doesn't know anything about Catalyst or DBIx::Class might
> wonder why something with such a strong warning is being recommended and
> extrapolate that to Catalyst. Someone might also have to explain the
> choice to management types. If the POD is not going to be updated, some
> kind of extra note should be included.
Yes, I'm quite curious about DBIx::Class but the EXPERIMENTAL warning
makes me a bit too nervous to start experimenting with it.
How safe/stable is DBIx these days? Should I be reading the mailing list
for it (more carefully)? Is there a list of known issues I can read?
Is there a balanced CDBI vs DBIx page anywhere?
I'm vaguely aware that there were some political issues with CDBI, but
I've totally forgotten the reasoning behind DBIx, or why I might want to
e: chisel at herlpacker.co.uk
More information about the Catalyst