[Catalyst] Scaffold Naming Conventions

[Christopher H. Laco]

I just noticed Catalyst-Helper-Controller-Scaffold-Mason-0.01 showed up 
on CPAN.

First, are these directions correct?

> script/myapp_create.pl controller SomeTable Scaffold CDBI::SomeTable

That looks exactly like the original scaffold. Is that correct?
I would expect to have to issue a different command:

> script/myapp_create.pl controller SomeTable Scaffold::Mason CDBI::SomeTable

otherwise how would create.pl know which scaffold to use?

My real question is thus: what is the official naming policy for 
scaffolds like this?

Catalyst-Helper-Controller-Scaffold-[ViewType] ?

Since I'm not done with my official Handel scaffolds and controllers, 
should they be:

Catalyst-Helper-Controller-Scaffold-Handel

instead of [from the demo]

Catalyst-Helper-Handel-Scaffold or even 
Catalyst-Helper-Controller-Hande::Scaffold?


As more and more of these pop up, it would be nice to keep their 
namespac names consistant?

-=Chris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20050906/47896e36/smime-0001.bin