[Catalyst] Protoype define_javascript_functions with Catalyst

[Kevin Old]

On 9/8/05, Kevin Old <kevinold at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/8/05, Matt S Trout <catalyst at trout.me.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:08:01AM -0400, Kevin Old wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm working on a Catalyst app that needs the use of HTML::Prototype
> > > and all is working just fine, but I have questions about using the
> > > define_javascript_functions.
> > >
> > > Right now, I'm making a call to it on every page that needs it.  All
> > > of the javascript is shown in the source and seems a little redundant
> > > to call it in several places.
> > >
> > > My thoughts are to create an ajaxjs.js file that won't be processed as
> > > a static JS file, and then put my call to define_javascript_functions
> > > in there and link to that script in the pages that need it.
> >
> > ISTR the Prototype helper will create a static .js file for you ...
> 
> Well, from the Catalyst::Plugin::Prototype POD it states:
> 
> This plugin replaces Catalyst::Helper::Prototype.
> 
> So, should I still use C::H::P?
> Will I have to regenerate the static files when
> HTML::Prototype/C::P::P is updated?

Nevermind...I just had a look at the source for C::H::P and saw it was
packaged together with C::P::P...

I need more coffee :)

Kevin
-- 
Kevin Old
kevinold at gmail.com