[Catalyst] Removed Catalyst::Build

Sebastian Riedel sri at oook.de
Wed Apr 19 02:57:31 CEST 2006

19.04.2006 01:44 A. Pagaltzis:

> * Sebastian Riedel <sri at oook.de> [2006-04-18 16:15]:
>> Why deprecate a module that gets never deleted?
> But that is a pretty arbitrary way to decide about when to
> delete. My own opinion is that deprecated code stays as long as
> it works without change, but once bit rot breaks it, it doesn’t
> get fixed, it gets dropped. That seems like a systematic way of
> making the call which balances user desire to delay changes with
> developer desire to avoid wasting effort on dead code: it just
> stays around as long as it costs nothing to keep it.

I'm cleaning the dist atm, it has been deprecated for 6 months now,
and so far nobody asked to keep it because *his* old code still  
requires it.
(no marcus, core devs don't count)


More information about the Catalyst mailing list