[Catalyst] Coverage tests in Catalyst

[Ian Docherty]

Don't we have to do both of these?

Coverage of the 'make test' will only show coverage for those modules we =

can test 'statically' i.e. by making direct calls to the methods in the =

tests

Tests that are done with LWP (or is it Mechanize) which are http =

requests to the application will probably be the bulk of the tests for a =

big application and these will not be caught by the first method but =

will by the second.

I suppose I am asking if both these can be combined to give total =

coverage from the two techniques.


Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> Ian Docherty wrote:
>   =

>> Is it possible to do coverage tests in a Catalyst application? If so
>> how? I can't find any references that help.
>>     =

>
> Catalyst apps aren't special -- do coverage tests like you would with
> any other perl module:
>
>     $ cover -delete
>     $ HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=3D-MDevel::Cover make test
>     $ cover
>
> If you want "coverage" and not test coverage (why?), then just do
>
>     $ perl -MDevel::Cover myapp_server.pl
>     <request stuff>
>     $ cover
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan Rockway
>
>   =


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20061205/abb0a=
43b/attachment.htm