[Catalyst] Virtual file system
mbit at ukr.net
Mon Dec 18 14:25:47 GMT 2006
Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote:
> vti wrote:
> > Actually I just want to stay in no-?-params style. I really like chaining
> > things when you have something like /material/1232/edit.
> And what if you want to edit something named edit?
> You could even get around that, but what about viewing something named
> Wouldn't be quite it.
> > I thought about the same way, but doing like:
> > /materials/add/<and here goes our path>
> You can do that too. But if you are always dealing with a variable
> number of arguments, prefixing the called action onto the path is the
> way to go imho. It is a much cleaner approach in my experience.
Thanks for sharing experience. Have you ever thought about the way to somehow
distiguish command from param? Like /material/bunch/of/params/:action
But probably ?-way is better then reinventing the wheel. It could be great if
there were some recomendations on this kind of question...
Appreciate your help
vti -- Viacheslav Tikhanovskii
Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Christ, saluteth you, always
labouring fervently for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and
complete in all the will of God.
-- Colossians 4:12
More information about the Catalyst