[Catalyst] Virtual file system

[vti]

Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote:
> vti wrote:
> > Actually I just want to stay in no-?-params style. I really like chaining
> > things when you have something like /material/1232/edit. 
> 
> And what if you want to edit something named edit?
> 
>   /material/edit/edit
> 
> You could even get around that, but what about viewing something named
> 123/edit?
> 
>   /material/123/edit
> 
> Wouldn't be quite it.
> 
> > I thought about the same way, but doing like:
> > 
> > /materials/add/<and here goes our path>
> 
> You can do that too. But if you are always dealing with a variable
> number of arguments, prefixing the called action onto the path is the
> way to go imho. It is a much cleaner approach in my experience.
> 

Thanks for sharing experience. Have you ever thought about the way to somehow
distiguish command from param? Like /material/bunch/of/params/:action

But probably ?-way is better then reinventing the wheel. It could be great if
there were some recomendations on this kind of question...

Appreciate your help

-- 
vti -- Viacheslav Tikhanovskii
Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Christ, saluteth you, always
labouring fervently for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and
complete in all the will of God.
		 -- Colossians 4:12