[Catalyst] on php

[Matt Cauthorn]

I agree with Kenny. The benefits are clear; Cat and projects like it will
gain momentum on their own accord because they just work, like a good MVC
setup should. After all, one can only go through so much pain with some of
the bloatware packages out there that claim to solve all of your problems
out of the box.

In my view Cat is a serious enterprise offering - the trick, as usual, is to
convince the corporate types that they are actually better served with an
open, modular and sane package like Cat.

Fortunately, some of these opinions may be changing after years of
struggling with the other enterprise "friendly" alternatives out there.
We'll just have to wait and see. In the meantime, keep up the great work.

Regards,
Matt Cauthorn

On 2/20/06, Christopher H. Laco <claco at chrislaco.com> wrote:
>
> Kenny Gatdula wrote:
> > I saw this post, http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/17/PHP,
> > and had to respond with at least a pointer to this project. Personally,
> > I think 2006 will be the year of the Cat, and I intend on spreading the
> > good word to whomever will listen.
> >
> > Kenny
>
> I would've added to your post that while Catalyst is Perl, it supports
> PHP templating, which is more in tune with that pages conversation
> [without just pushing Perl].
>
> -=Chris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Catalyst mailing list
> Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20060225/310a81d0/attachment.htm