[Catalyst] YAML vs. *

[Matt S Trout]

John Napiorkowski wrote:
> I know most people seem to think XML is bloated
> overkill, but I would greatly have preferred it.  XML
> seems safe to the suits that pay the bills.  Most of
> them get nervous when I say configuration is using
> YAML.  Actually I would prefer something based on a
> RDF XML format, but I doubt people want a
> configuration with namespaces in it :)

ConfigLoader already supports use of XML::Simple, which works well enough for 
most purposes. I definitely don't think this is the best default though; XML 
config files drive me batshit worse than YAML and I think that's the case for 
a lot of people.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Offering custom development, consultancy and support
   Technical Director    contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information

+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +