[Catalyst] YAML vs. *

[Thomas Nagel]

Matt S Trout schrieb:
> I love YAML as a serialisation format for data transfer, but so far as stuff 
> like config files that are designed for human write / machine read, I 
> personally think it sucks. Massively.

I agree but what about something like:

'View::TToolkit' =>
  { INCLUDE_PATH => [__PACKAGE__->path_to('tt2/content'),
                     __PACKAGE__->path_to('tt2/lib')    ],
    WRAPPER      => [qw/html layout/],
    PRE_PROCESS  => [qw/config macros design/],
    ...

Although INI style is my preferred format, the above is definitely not
easy to formulate that way or am I missing something?

And XML and JSON seem to be a little bit too 'noisy' to me ...


-Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3287 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20060609/f74359d3/attachment.bin