[Catalyst] OT: mod_fastcgi vs. mod_perl (was uri_for() question)
Perrin Harkins
perrin at elem.com
Tue Mar 28 01:21:36 CEST 2006
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 20:00 -0300, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior
wrote:
> Well... I'm not really talking about the end-users but about the
> shared hosting company which wants to offer some sort of application
> persistence. FastCGI is much more manageable than mod_perl from this
> POV.
Yeah, shared hosts are probably better off with FastCGI. SpeedyCGI and
PPerl are also possible alternatives for people on shared hosts that
won't do FastCGI. SpeedyCGI looks kind of abandoned these days though.
- Perrin
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list