[Catalyst] Re: template comparison (was: why not mason (was: something else unrelated))

[Pedro Melo]

Hi,

On Oct 27, 2006, at 11:01 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> None of these engines provides a separate concise syntax to cover
> the 18% AND the power of a *real* language to cover the 2%.

I wonder if using PHP as a template language for Catalyst would fly...

Has anybody tested or use Catalyst::View::PHP that's on CPAN?

Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
JID: xmpp:melo at simplicidade.org