Re: [Catalyst] Re: State of the art in form validation; opinion poll… Model based forms/validation?

[Ashley Pond V]

Really good food for thought from everyone. Strangely enough, at  
least when I notice, Bill's code is the most like my own of anyone on  
the list; in approach and style. I'm less certain than ever, of  
course, what I'll end up with but I'm better informed.

Thanks everyone.

On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:37 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:

> * Bill Moseley <moseley at hank.org> [2007-12-05 05:45]:
>> The Rose form code is very cool. That's what I based my forms
>> on.
>
> Disclaimer: I haven’t used Form::Processor. However from what
> I have seen so far, it seems to solve the *right* problem, with
> the right level of abstraction for common things and tweakability
> for individual needs, so it currently seems like the most likely
> validation framework to work for me.
>
>> I don't find automatic form markup creation that useful -- the
>> forms always seem to need customization.
>
> Template system of choice + HTML::FillInForm works for me and
> keeps things reasonably low-effort.
>
> Regards,
> -- 
> Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.scsys.co.uk
> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/ 
> catalyst at lists.rawmode.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/