[Catalyst] Re: Catalyst vs Rails vs Django Cook off

Daniel McBrearty danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
Mon Jan 15 19:27:08 GMT 2007


I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be meaningful if it was done
well. Not that anyone should choose their framework on the basis of
such a benchmark, but it's a factor to throw into the mix.


On 1/15/07, Jonathan Rockway <jon at jrock.us> wrote:
> On Monday 15 January 2007 06:19, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> > I don't know what the point of benchmarking frameworks against
> > each other is, particularly for such an unrepresentative case.
>
> Ad impressions.
>
> --
> package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
> $,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
> ";$;"]->[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;->setup;
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>


-- 
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131



More information about the Catalyst mailing list