[Catalyst] Re: Catalyst vs Rails vs Django Cook off

[David Morel]

Le 15 janv. 07 à 21:51, Christopher Hicks a écrit :

> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:27:08PM +0100, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
>> I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be meaningful if it was done
>> well. Not that anyone should choose their framework on the basis of
>> such a benchmark, but it's a factor to throw into the mix

Does that include dynamic content caching wizardry ? It is  
meaningless if you don't take into account real-life scenarios like  
reverse proxy cache invalidation policies (and tricks). This is just  
to say that all this perf talk is meaningless : sometimes the power  
you get from a well thought out framework allows you to do things  
that are close to magick, speed-wise among others. Comparing simple  
setups is ridiculous IMHO.

David Morel