[Catalyst] html::prototype syntax in new Cat version

[Matt S Trout]

On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:23:21AM +0300, vb wrote:
> >
> >There is absolutely no reason to use Prototype.
> 
> 
> The Prototype + Scriptaculous javascript framework is junk.
> 
> 
> "There is absolutely no reason to use"... Prototype + Scriptaculous
> 
> It doesn't work very well, the syntax is terrible, it will break other
> >javascript on the page just by being included
> 
> 
> This is not true, for prototype.js (including "the syntax" wich is as it is
> in OO-javaScript...).
> I have a working application in which is used prototype.js, tinyMCE.js,
> tabber.js (from Patrick Fitzgerald) with Catalyst and TT. Many complex
> applications (and widgets) exists, based on prototype.js.

Complex applications can be written using shit tools.

It doesn't stop them being shit.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical Director    Want a managed development or deployment platform?
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/             http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/