[Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RDBO/RHTMLO integration with Catalyst - work in progress

[Matt S Trout]

On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:02:24AM -0500, Peter Karman wrote:
> check out Catalyst::Controller::Rose on cpan.
> 
> It has a different philosophy than what you've described. But if you find 
> features missing that you think would make it more useful, please send me 
> patches/tests/docs etc. You might consider writing a new 
> Catalyst::Controller::Rose::SomeThing to implement what you're describing 
> with YAML.

Do you have any plans to split the dependencies a bit on this?

I've always been quite fond of RHTMLO and have been on a couple projects now
where we considered Controller::Rose and had to pass on it because it
assumed you wanted RDBO as well.

Catalyst stuff should really be as non-opinionated as possible - people might
want to use RDBO with a different form library too, and it'd be nice for the
glue to elegantly support that case as well.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical Director    Want a managed development or deployment platform?
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/             http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/