[Catalyst] Re: RFC for handling reverse proxies not deployed to standard ports.

[A. Pagaltzis]

* Dave Rolsky <autarch at urth.org> [2007-06-15 19:05]:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Marlon Bailey wrote:
> >Extras considerations:  After speaking with Matt(mst) about
> >this, he also suggested allowing the "Path" value to be set
> >from a header value as well.
> 
> And _another_ one to add ...

This is getting a bit much – how about X-Public-URI-Base and
letting the frontend pass the full base URI to the backend. That
would solve all the mentioned problems in one fell swoop and
might also address things that haven’t occured to anyone yet,
plus it’s much simpler than cobbling together the URI from 5
different headers.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>