[Catalyst] ActiveRecord for Perl
Matt S Trout
dbix-class at trout.me.uk
Tue May 22 16:51:15 GMT 2007
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:36:18PM +0200, Adam Bartosik wrote:
> >What would that achieve that passing literal SQL chunks for SELECT, FROM,
> >WHERE etc. wouldn't?
>
> Readability. Complex SQL statements are more clear to understand than
> complex dbix "statements" when you are not an author of DBIX ;)
> I can also test it with simple copy&paste to sql console to see how it
> works, how it is planned / optimized.
>
> I know it is ORM and database abstraction, I'm theoretically independent
> from my DB vendor and so on, but it doesn't change the fact it is more
> complicated, more "noise", more "strange" -opt { qw[col1 col2] } than
> pure SQL statement.
>
> And when all this Catalyst/Dbix stuff is so flexible - why I should
> fight with such approach?
Ok, I can see all of those arguments.
So here's the one big remaining question - why haven't you worked out what
syntax you'd like to see for this feature and started a thread on the
dbix-class list to discuss it? :)
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or deployment platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list