[Catalyst] Requirement for Makfile.PL or Build.PL in "home"?

[Jonathan Rockway]

On Monday 28 May 2007 08:25:05 pm Jeff Chimene wrote:
> I don't have time to argue with you. You are not the arbiter of good or
> bad development/deployment practices. I certainly will not be hiring you
> for any projects.

You are the arbiter of bad development/deployment practices.  To others 
reading this thread without a vested interest:

 * use Makefile.PL
 * keep it updated
 * deploy with tar or PAR

That is all.

BTW, you're aware that Matt wrote a large portion of Catalyst and DBIx::Class, 
right?  He knows what he's talking about.  I wouldn't dismiss his advice so 
quickly.  You should be thanking him for suggesting a correction in your 
processes before it bit you in the ass.  Most of the other readers of the 
list had the same idea, but he decided to actually bring it up.  That's 
pretty nice of him.

And finally, don't take offense to being called out on a mailing list.  Would 
you rather correct your bad idea on a mailing list where nobody cares about 
you, or would you rather lose your job and clients when your technique fucks 
up an important production push?  This is just a mailing list... use it as an 
opportunity to learn; don't get offended.

OK, I'm done now.  Gnite :)

Regards,
Jonathan Rockway

-- 
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
";$;"]->[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;->setup;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20070529/79a0a973/attachment.pgp