[Catalyst] Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...

Jonathan Rockway jon at jrock.us
Mon May 5 21:46:09 BST 2008

* On Mon, May 05 2008, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> tht's reasonable.
> what is not so reasonable is suddenly deciding that you are going to
> *croak* on something which you didn't even test for with previous
> releases.
> A warning would have been fine, at least for half a year or so.

In that case we would be having this exact discussion 6 months from
now.  Breaking broken code is always good.  +1 for HTTP::Message.

If you don't want new versions of modules, then *don't upgrade them*.

Jonathan Rockway

print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"

More information about the Catalyst mailing list