[Catalyst] Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...
jon at jrock.us
Mon May 5 21:46:09 BST 2008
* On Mon, May 05 2008, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> tht's reasonable.
> what is not so reasonable is suddenly deciding that you are going to
> *croak* on something which you didn't even test for with previous
> A warning would have been fine, at least for half a year or so.
In that case we would be having this exact discussion 6 months from
now. Breaking broken code is always good. +1 for HTTP::Message.
If you don't want new versions of modules, then *don't upgrade them*.
print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"
More information about the Catalyst