[Catalyst] Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...

[Jonathan Rockway]

* On Mon, May 05 2008, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> tht's reasonable.
>
> what is not so reasonable is suddenly deciding that you are going to
> *croak* on something which you didn't even test for with previous
> releases.
>
> A warning would have been fine, at least for half a year or so.

In that case we would be having this exact discussion 6 months from
now.  Breaking broken code is always good.  +1 for HTTP::Message.

If you don't want new versions of modules, then *don't upgrade them*.

Regards,
Jonathan Rockway

-- 
print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"