[Catalyst] Re: RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage

Kiffin Gish kiffin.gish at planet.nl
Fri Apr 24 11:55:06 GMT 2009


I prefer just 'programming language'

-- 
Kiffin Gish <kiffin.gish at planet.nl>


On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 07:43 -0400, kevin montuori wrote:
> >>>>> "ZL" == Zbigniew Lukasiak <zzbbyy at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
>  >> ... the revolutionary Moose Object system, the most advanced
>  >> Object Oriented framework for any major scripting language
> 
>  ZL> I would change that to 'one of the most advanced' - less flame
>  ZL> igniting (and by the way Perl 6 probably does have a more
>  ZL> advanced Object system).
> 
> Why not something like "... the most productive ..." -- Moose is great
> but not exactly advancing the state of the art; indeed, it's
> implementing a technique/protocol that's been around a long time now.
> 
> Also, why does Perl have to be a "scripting language"?  I don't write
> scripts (particularly with Moose), I write programs.  If you're
> uncomfortable with "any major language" (or, better, "any popular
> language") how about substituting "interpreted" for "scripting"?
> 
> Just a thought.  It's nice to see someone publicizing Catalyst!
> 
> 
> k.
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Catalyst mailing list