[Catalyst] Re: RFC: Sample press release and announcement homepage
Kiffin Gish
kiffin.gish at planet.nl
Fri Apr 24 11:55:06 GMT 2009
I prefer just 'programming language'
--
Kiffin Gish <kiffin.gish at planet.nl>
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 07:43 -0400, kevin montuori wrote:
> >>>>> "ZL" == Zbigniew Lukasiak <zzbbyy at gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> >> ... the revolutionary Moose Object system, the most advanced
> >> Object Oriented framework for any major scripting language
>
> ZL> I would change that to 'one of the most advanced' - less flame
> ZL> igniting (and by the way Perl 6 probably does have a more
> ZL> advanced Object system).
>
> Why not something like "... the most productive ..." -- Moose is great
> but not exactly advancing the state of the art; indeed, it's
> implementing a technique/protocol that's been around a long time now.
>
> Also, why does Perl have to be a "scripting language"? I don't write
> scripts (particularly with Moose), I write programs. If you're
> uncomfortable with "any major language" (or, better, "any popular
> language") how about substituting "interpreted" for "scripting"?
>
> Just a thought. It's nice to see someone publicizing Catalyst!
>
>
> k.
>
>
>
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list