[Catalyst] [Announce] Catalyst-Runtime-5.8000_05

[Frank Wiegand]

Am Donnerstag, den 29.01.2009, 10:34 +0100 schrieb Marcus Ramberg:
> Now that you're all done upgrading to 5.7100, it's time to help us out
> by testing the next developer release of 5.8000, 5.8000_05, which was
> uploaded to CPAN today.

Thanks, great job!

t/optional_memleak.t fails some of its tests.
Is this something to worry about?

See also RT Ticket #42540, which was filled against 5.7100.


t/optional_memleak..........................................1/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/response/status/s200' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51781632'
#     expected: '51666944'
t/optional_memleak..........................................3/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/response/status/s403' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51798016'
#     expected: '51793920'
t/optional_memleak..........................................5/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/response/status/s500' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51802112'
#     expected: '51798016'
t/optional_memleak..........................................15/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/index' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51826688'
#     expected: '51822592'
t/optional_memleak..........................................18/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/action/index/foo' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51830784'
#     expected: '51826688'
t/optional_memleak..........................................22/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/response/redirect/one' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51879936'
#     expected: '51875840'
t/optional_memleak..........................................26/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/response/headers/one' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51884032'
#     expected: '51879936'
t/optional_memleak..........................................32/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/request/uri/change_base' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51888128'
#     expected: '51884032'	
t/optional_memleak..........................................34/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/request/uri?a=1;a=2;b=3' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51892224'
#     expected: '51888128'
t/optional_memleak..........................................43/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/foo/bar/action' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '51924992'
#     expected: '51920896'
t/optional_memleak..........................................60/75
#   Failed test ''http://localhost/engine/response/errors/two' memory is not leaking'
#   at t/optional_memleak.t line 73.
#          got: '52051968'
#     expected: '52043776'
t/optional_memleak..........................................75/75 # Looks like you failed 11 tests of 75.
t/optional_memleak.......................................... Dubious, test returned 11 (wstat 2816, 0xb00)
 Failed 11/75 subtests


This test ran under bleadperl. Using 5.8.9 I get failures too:
Tests 1, 2, 5, 14, 19, 33, 37, 39, 46, 48, 50, 59.


Thanks, Frank