[Catalyst] patch for C::P::Session::Store::Cookie

J. Shirley jshirley at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 20:29:42 GMT 2009

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomas Doran <bobtfish at bobtfish.net> wrote:

> On 9 Jun 2009, at 19:19, J. Shirley wrote:
>> Being able to specify the session cookie name based on the request would
>> be useful for edge cases.
> I totally agree.
> How would something like a 'cookie_name_stash_key' configuration parameter
> sit with you?
> If not provided, we do what we do now, if provided then that stash key wi=
> be used if present and defined, otherwise the default handling will be us=
If it can understand nested keys in the stash, I'm all in favor of it.

Something like $c->stash->{page}->{cookie_domain} would fit inline with what
I currently do for similar things.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20090609/7149c=

More information about the Catalyst mailing list