[Catalyst] In search of RESTful CRUD holy grail
Bruce Keeler
bruce at drangle.com
Wed Mar 4 18:30:47 GMT 2009
On 3/4/2009 4:45 AM, Moritz Onken wrote:
> Furthermore I would not put the form rendering in the same path as the
> REST interface.
This is my preference too. Keep the browser stuff out of the REST api.
>
> I would do something like this:
>
>
> # POST /foo -> create new record
> # GET /foo -> list all records
> # PUT /foo/<pk> -> update record
> # DELETE /foo/<pk> -> delete record
> # GET /foo/<pk> -> view record
> # GET /form/foo/<pk> -> edit record form
> # GET /form/foo -> create record form
>
> So now, what do we do with errors and redisplay of forms.
> I would say a form should post / put / delete to the rest api.
> Within that controller we can easily see if a browser is requesting
> this url or a web service (see ForBrowser's looks_like_browser()).
> If it's a browser we can detach to the /form/foo controller.
> Otherwise we show the errors in the format of the Accept header.
>
I don't like this, however. If your UI is all AJAXy, by all means let
it use the REST api directly. But for old-school HTML forms, I'd post
to the /form/foo or /form/foo/<pk> and let that controller either call
the REST api internally, or bypass it altogether.
Bruce
More information about the Catalyst
mailing list