[Catalyst] Catalyst benchmark 5.7 VS 5.8

David Silva davidslv at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 15:11:26 GMT 2009


Sorry to interrupt, but that is a !!WOW!!

I used CentOS a few weeks ago and i have to say that it could be better if
it was updated... But seems that they are with internal problems ...

2009/9/28 Stuart Watt <swatt at infobal.com>

>  Toby Corkindale wrote:
>
> (CentOS 5 was one of the operating systems that came with the badly-patch=
ed Perl with the slow bless performance..
> although I'm sure it's been patched by now?
> ie. http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
> )
>
>
>  This issue is still listed as open for Centos;
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3D2357
>
> I was surprised at this, but I had checked a couple of months back and no
> progress. I gave up on Centos in 1997 because of this, and am surprised h=
ow
> long this is taking.
>
> All the best
> Stuart
> --
> Stuart Watt
> ARM Product Developer
> Information Balance
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.scsys.co.uk
> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>
>


-- =

David Silva - http://davidslv.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20090928/b9dfe=
554/attachment.htm


More information about the Catalyst mailing list