[Catalyst] Alternatives to Catalyst ?

[Dermot]

On 21 April 2010 18:01, J. Shirley <jshirley at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> __END__
> Benchmark: running all, low, sep for at least 1 CPU seconds...
>       all:  1 wallclock secs ( 1.11 usr +  0.00 sys =  1.11 CPU) @
> 2917341.44/s (n=3238249)
>       low:  0 wallclock secs ( 1.27 usr +  0.04 sys =  1.31 CPU) @
> 12930179.39/s (n=16938535)
>       sep:  1 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr +  0.01 sys =  1.22 CPU) @
> 3223081.15/s (n=3932159)
>
> Subroutines suck, lets all use hashrefs.


Now that it's quietened down, I can ask a question. Does this I mean
it's preferable to use

$c->req->{parameters}->{foo}

rather than

$c->req->param('foo')

Obviously I'd rather use the faster method but if I'm breaking the
encapsulation in some ways that's going to bite me later, I'd steer
clear.
Dp.