[Catalyst] Alternatives to Catalyst ?
paikkos at googlemail.com
Mon Apr 26 09:36:33 GMT 2010
On 21 April 2010 18:01, J. Shirley <jshirley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Benchmark: running all, low, sep for at least 1 CPU seconds...
> all: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.11 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.11 CPU) @
> 2917341.44/s (n=3238249)
> low: 0 wallclock secs ( 1.27 usr + 0.04 sys = 1.31 CPU) @
> 12930179.39/s (n=16938535)
> sep: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr + 0.01 sys = 1.22 CPU) @
> 3223081.15/s (n=3932159)
> Subroutines suck, lets all use hashrefs.
Now that it's quietened down, I can ask a question. Does this I mean
it's preferable to use
Obviously I'd rather use the faster method but if I'm breaking the
encapsulation in some ways that's going to bite me later, I'd steer
More information about the Catalyst