[Catalyst] Re: A point of confusion/frustration on chained actions

Jeff Albert jralbert at uvic.ca
Fri May 28 20:21:39 GMT 2010

Can you expand on this? I followed the suggestion that Ido and others had put forward, but I don't like the 'extra' midpoint to extend the chain; what would a simple example of your proposed solution look like?


-----Original Message-----
From: Aristotle Pagaltzis [mailto:pagaltzis at gmx.de] 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:48 AM
To: catalyst at lists.scsys.co.uk
Subject: [Catalyst] Re: A point of confusion/frustration on chained actions

* Ido Perlmuter <ido at ido50.net> [2010-05-20 00:35]:
> In this case all you have to do is create the comment
> action as a mid point, and then create another action with
> a different name, but the same PathPart (e.g. comment) only
> this time as an end-point, and all this action needs to do is
> forward or detach to the original action (also passing any
> parameters it needs).

Don’t do that.

Chain a `PathPart('')` endpoint from the mid-point.

Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

List: Catalyst at lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

More information about the Catalyst mailing list