[Catalyst] What text editor to use?
catalyst at mikeraynham.co.uk
Wed Mar 2 16:59:41 GMT 2011
On 02/03/11 16:44, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi John,
> On Wednesday 02 Mar 2011 13:10:04 John M. Dlugosz wrote:
>> What's a good text editor to use for Catalyst/TT development?
>> The editor I really like for C++ doesn't handle XML well. I've been using
>> "Notepad++" for windows, but the syntax highlighting doesn't understand
>> mixing TT inside the base language, and it has tabs only instead of
>> multiple visible windows.
>> I would entertain both Windows and Linux solutions.
> First of all, see:
> I'm personally using GVim, which is the GUI version of Vim (
> http://www.vim.org/ ), which was originally based on vi and still mostly
> compatible with it, but now it's much more improved and a far different beast.
> It takes some time getting used to, although things like
> ":source $VIMRUNTIME/mswin.vim" can help a lot, even though mswin.vim is not
> very recommended.[mswin-vim] Anyway, a usable subset of Vim can be learned
> very quickly, and you constantly discover more and more stuff and there are
> many people who share useful Vim tips on the Web, on E-mail or on IRC.
> As Su-Shee notes here -
> - vim has recently gained a status of somewhat being of a "hip" and being the
> IT-editor, that all the cool kids are using. I've used it a long time before
> that, but it is rumoured that it has been the most commonly used editor among
> experienced Linux users for a while.
> Vim is open-source (also GPL-compatible) and cross-platform - a gratis version
> is available for most versions of UNIX/X, for Windows 32-bit and 64-bit, for
> Mac OS X, and for many more exotic platforms. It is extensible in many
> languages including its built-in vimscript, and Perl 5, Python, Ruby, Tcl, Lua
> and Scheme.
> Another very fine editor is naturally GNU Emacs, which many people joke about
> being a good OS that lacks a good text editor. I personally don't mind the
> fact it ships with many extraneous features that I'm likely not going to use,
> but I just never been able to get used to it. Some people use it and love it,
> but I've known or heard of people who switched from it to Vim (and naturally
> vice versa).
> I have a list of some other recommended text editors and IDEs (both FOSS and
> proprietary) here:
> That put aside, I should note that "text is text", and as long as the output
> you produce is encoded correctly (e.g: ASCII, UTF-8, etc.) and compiles and is
> functional (and may be styled properly), then it doesn't really matter which
> editor you're using and different members of your team can use different
> editors. I found different editors than vim/gvim useful for working on, say,
> text written in the Hebrew alphabet, or bidirectional script, because gvim has
> poor support for display Bidirectional text. And some aspects of the vim
> philosophy or API are sub-optimal in my case (but I guess I can blame myself
> for not contributing).
> [mswin-vim] - I have the following in my .vimrc:
> " Add Microsoft Windows-like behaviour
> " Old habits die hard.
> " - cancelled so old habits will die
> " source $VIMRUNTIME/mswin.vim
> I commented it only a few months ago, and while there has been some transition
> things, I'm getting used to it.
> Shlomi Fish
There's also a handy TT syntax highlighting plugin for vim:
More information about the Catalyst