<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Marcus Ramberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marcus@nordaaker.com">marcus@nordaaker.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2009/6/5 Francesc Romŕ i Frigolé <<a href="mailto:francesc.roma%2Bcatalyst@gmail.com">francesc.roma+catalyst@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="im">> 1) It should be possible to create an application with catalyst version X<br>
> and then run the catalyst helper again on catalyst version < X (assuming it<br>
> doesn't use any feature of the newer version). Right now if an application<br>
> has been created with Catalyst 5.8, running it with 5.7 is not just a matter<br>
> of changing the line "use Catalyst::Runtime 5.80;"<br>
<br></div></blockquote><div class="im">
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">This would mean that we could never use new features from newer<br>
Runtime distributions in newer skeletons. That seems like a<br>
restriction that would be counter-productive to me. If you want to<br>
develop to target older Runtimes than the current one, I suggest using<br>
matching -Devel helpers.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Marcus<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
List: <a href="mailto:Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk">Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk</a><br>
Listinfo: <a href="http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst" target="_blank">http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst</a><br>
Searchable archive: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/</a><br>
Dev site: <a href="http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/" target="_blank">http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">Yea, we'd end up having to do a lot of backcompat checking to see what version we need to dish up, if it's not going to be the current one. That, imho, would be very counterproductive as Marcus stated and would increase the time it takes us to get this finished many fold.<br>
-- <br>Devin Austin<br><a href="http://www.codedright.net">http://www.codedright.net</a><br><a href="http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?326568/hosting.html">http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?326568/hosting.html</a> - Host with DreamHost!<br>