On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomas Doran <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bobtfish@bobtfish.net">bobtfish@bobtfish.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On 9 Jun 2009, at 19:19, J. Shirley wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Being able to specify the session cookie name based on the request would be useful for edge cases.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I totally agree.<br>
<br>
How would something like a 'cookie_name_stash_key' configuration parameter sit with you?<br>
<br>
If not provided, we do what we do now, if provided then that stash key will be used if present and defined, otherwise the default handling will be used.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>If it can understand nested keys in the stash, I'm all in favor of it.<br><br>Something like $c->stash->{page}->{cookie_domain} would fit inline with what I currently do for similar things.<br>
<br>-J <br></div></div>