On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Peter Edwards <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter@dragonstaff.co.uk">peter@dragonstaff.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On 5 November 2010 14:50, James Spath <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jspath@pangeamedia.com" target="_blank">jspath@pangeamedia.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>I was wondering what people's opinions are on the various messaging/logging queues available. I know this subject has come up before, but things change, so another discussion is probably worthwhile.</div><div><br>
</div><div>We're considering the following solutions for a new production we are working on:</div><div><br></div><div> - scribe</div><div> - rabbitmq</div><div> - gearman</div><div> - beanstalkd</div><div> - TheSchwartz</div>
<div></div></blockquote><div> </div></div><div>ApacheMQ is worth considering. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>ActiveMQ you mean? Yeah, I had looked at that.</div><div><br></div><div>I just found this page which has a TON of information on it:</div>
<div><a href="http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Message_Queue_Evaluation_Notes">http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Message_Queue_Evaluation_Notes</a></div><div><br></div><div>Although they don't mention scribe ... I suppose because it's more of a log aggregation technology vs a messaging queue.</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Jim </div></div>