[DBIx-Class-Devel] Review request topic/populate_doc (unrelated
to Brendan's work)
Brendan Byrd
Perl at ResonatorSoft.org
Thu Dec 13 19:56:45 GMT 2012
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+dbic at rabbit.us> wrote:
>
> You hold the "pod-style baton" now - so go with whatever you think fits
> best the overall picture.
Bah. I put out a doc branch or two and suddenly I'm Senior
Documentation Specialist? OSS FTW.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:17 PM, fREW Schmidt <frioux at gmail.com> wrote:
> I disagree and use \%foo and \@bar all the time. Additionally []
> apparently means optional in our pod, so how do you make it clear
> what's an arrayref of arrayrefs (as in popuplate) or an optional list
> of arrayrefs?
>
> Note that I think this is stupid and that [] as optional only makes
> sense for commandline help, but I don't care enough to change minds :)
Oh man, I'm already tired of documentation... No, I don't like the
"optional" thingy, either. I care enough, but don't quite have the
energy for it today.
Wait, are you sure? We use ? for optional.
https://metacpan.org/module/BBYRD/DBIx-Class-0.08204_01/lib/DBIx/Class/Manual/Reading.pod
Yeah, I got nothing for []. It's ?.
--
Brendan Byrd <Perl at ResonatorSoft.org>
Brendan Byrd <BBYRD at CPAN.org>
More information about the DBIx-Class-Devel
mailing list