[DBIx-Class-Devel] version numbering scheme

[John SJ Anderson]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+dbic at rabbit.us> wrote:

>> I propose the following version number scheme: $major.$minor.$bugfix
>> which translates to $major.$three-digits-minor$three-digits-bugfix in
>> floating point version number style.

[ snip ]

> To summarize - I am opposed to 1.0 until many more of the new features
> have landed, and am opposed to all the reasoning Abraxxa gave above.

[ snip ]

I would say "sidestep the whole issue and just document that the
version number is a monotonically increasing number with no semantics"
-- but the project has had non-continuous version number bumps (with
semantic meaning) in the past, so that ship has sailed.

Given that, +1 for pretty much everything castaway said.

j.