No subject

```
We do use `deploy` indeed. Previously we just added view_definition manually, but we would be happy to use auto-generated one (we have already monkey-patched Schema::Loader not to generate view_definiton as a workaround).

I understand you don't want to parse SQL, but there is a way to get view definition from MySQL without database name: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/show-create-view.html

On Thu Jan 26 13:27:15 2017, ilmari at ilmari.org wrote:
> Hi Vadim,
> 
> "Pushtaev Vadim via RT" <bug-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader at rt.cpan.org>
> writes:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since the last update, DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader automatically
> > creates `view_definition` for views. In case of MySQL it uses `SELECT
> > view_definition FROM information_schema.views ...` query and the
> > result of this query contains the database name along with every table
> > name: `project`.`user` instead of just `user`.
> 
> Schema::Loader does deliberately not do anything with the view
> definition SQL, since that would require a fully-fledged SQL parser.
> This is incidentally why it does not introspect the view definition for
> DB2, since that only gives you the whole CREATE VIEW statement, not the
> body separately.
> 
> > It's a big issue for our project since different users and
> > environments use different database names. It would be great to have
> > view definition without database name or at least disable
> > view_definition generation at all.
> 
> For non-virtual views, the view definition is only used for ->deploy.
> The fact that you're happy with not having it generated at all makes it
> seem to me that you're not using deploy, so the definition is purely
> informative.
> 
> If you really need it, you can add an sqlt_deploy_hook method to the
> result class that modifies $view->sql as appropriate for your specific
> case.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Ilmari
> 


```