On 07/15/2015 08:34 PM, Samuel Smith wrote:<br>
><br>
> I think I could revise to include some other docs, yes. The issue is <br>
> for some of us, we know and have used DBIx::Class many times, it is <br>
> just sometimes months go by in between usage and as a quick refresher <br>
> (at least for me), the cookbook examples are used since they are more <br>
> advanced. And this can lead to missing out on some concepts that might <br>
> have been coved better elsewhere in the docs.<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
Right. I don't mind the actual fix. I am worried about the inconsistent <br>
"here and there" patchups, that lead to even further fragmentation of <br>
the documentation. To a point where it becomes a completely different <br>
thing depending on your entry point as a reader. So I *really* wish you <br>
could do a little more digging, and come up with a more substantial <br>
"here are the spots where we need to mention the concept, and maybe even <br>
link back to a longer explanation that possibly resides right at the <br>
->table() method POD"<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance!<br>
<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href="https://github.com/dbsrgits/dbix-class/pull/80#issuecomment-121709605">view it on GitHub</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AASeAivyPes241BiND7dPFzC6I_1cJZ1ks5odqHggaJpZM4FXGSj.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
<link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/dbsrgits/dbix-class/pull/80#issuecomment-121709605"></link>
<meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>