[Dbix-class] CDBI Compatability Issue: Iterators

[Christopher H. Laco]

Matt S Trout wrote:
> As I say, I think making construct alias to new for the compatibility
> layer is a good idea.
> 
> However the primary DBIx-Class constructor should still be new(), and
> "doesn't have a new" isn't a Class::DBI feature; it's merely a factor of
> how Class::DBI implements its features - otherwise reductio ad absurdum
> would say that we shouldn't use any method name not in Class::DBI in case
> somebody uses that in their subclass :)
> 

reductio ad absurdum -- is that Latin for Stupid User Tricks :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.rawmode.org/pipermail/dbix-class/attachments/20050819/91f1f0a3/smime-0001.bin