[Dbix-class] Re: DBIx::Class POD NAME section

[Krzysztof Krzyzaniak]

Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:38:08AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
> 
>>Matt S Trout wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:00:51AM +0100, David Baird wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 9/20/05, Matt S Trout <dbix-class at trout.me.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>NAME
>>>>>  DBIx::Class - Because the brain is a terrible thing to waste.
>>>>
>>>>Any chance you can change this? It just annoys the hell out of me.
>>>>Maybe I need to drink more coffee. Or less. Or something. I feel a Bad
>>>>Mood Day coming on.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hang on, there's documentation?! Musta been someone else, guvnor :)
>>>
>>>More seriously, that's just a placeholder that nobody ever got round to
>>>replacing; given the sense of humour I'd strongly suspect Marcus Ramberg
>>>is the culprit, and quite possibly left that there as a hint to me to
>>>fill out the documentation stubs he was kind enough to add.
>>>
>>>I've posted this mail to the dbix-class list as well in the hopes that
>>>we can discuss replacement text ==========================> over there.
>>
>>So far in debian package I have:
>>
>>Description: sql to oop mapper, inspired by the Class::DBI framework
>>
>>I know, it's not fancy but it's descriptive :-)
> 
> 
> It's also going to bring the peanut gallery down upon me. I already got
> one "waaaah you can't mention your module on the cdbi list cos they're
> competing and it's mean to Class::DBI coz modules have feelings to!!11ONE"
> e-mail. I have better things to do than reply to more.
> 
> How about "ResultSet-oriented Object<->Relational Mapper for perl" ?

sounds fine for me

   eloy
-- 
-------e-l-o-y---------------------------e-l-o-y- at -k-o-f-e-i-n-a-.-n-e-t------

        jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej