[Dbix-class] Unnecessary re-fetching via belongs_to relationships?

[Mark Blythe]

> Yeah, it currently does that.

Ok, thanks for confirming it.  I'll do my best to re-factor my code
around it for now.

> Making it the same object would either create a circular reference or result in
> one copy going out of scope taking the rest out of scope.

Maybe weak references (5.8+) and/or proxy objects?

(although a data caching solution would be cool)