[Dbix-class] search_literal

[Richard Robinson]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:43:20AM +0100, Ash Berlin wrote:
> > brett gardner wrote:
> > > I think I have found a bug with search_literal. If you get a resultset 
> > > that came from a search_literal, and try to apply another search_literal 
> > > to it, the bind values are in the wrong order eg.

I think this is what I've been seeing, with a subsequent ordinary search. But I'm
not completely sure, there are bugs in my code too ...

> Plus a doc patch saying "this only exists for Class::DBI compatibility, do
> -not- use in normal DBIx::Class code".

What, search_literal ?

-- 
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem