[Dbix-class] ANNOUNCE: 0.08099_08 (0.08100_RC2)

[Andreas Mock]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Peter Rabbitson" <rabbit+dbic at rabbit.us>
> Gesendet: 05.04.09 02:52:53
> An: "DBIx::Class user and developer list" <dbix-class at lists.scsys.co.uk>
> Betreff: Re: [Dbix-class] ANNOUNCE: 0.08099_08 (0.08100_RC2)
>
> I am currently traveling, do not have the ability to tend to my email.
> Nevertheless - please send any problems you have to this list. Either
> someone else will pick up the lead, 

Hi all,

as Peter proposed I send it to the list. And probably Matt is also reading
here.

When I do a 'make test' for SQL::Abstract (1.51) as a building block for the
newest DBIC I get the following errors (?):

----------------------------------------------------8<----------------------------------------------------------------
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00new............ok
t/01generate.......ok
t/02where..........ok
t/03values.........ok
t/04modifiers......# SQL expressions differ
#      got:  WHERE ( ( x != ? OR x != ? OR x != ? OR x != ? ) )
# expected: WHERE x != ? AND x != ? AND x != ?
# differing in :
# OP [OR] != [AND] in
# left: x != ? OR x != ? OR x != ? OR x != ?
# right: x != ? AND x != ? AND x != ?
#
# BIND values differ
#      got: [
#           '-and',
#           1,
#           2,
#           3
#         ]
# expected: [
#           1,
#           2,
#           3
#         ]
t/04modifiers......ok 1/116# SQL expressions differ
#      got:  WHERE ( ( x LIKE ? AND x OR ? ) )
# expected: WHERE (x != ? OR x >= ?) AND x LIKE ?
# differing in :
# OP [LIKE] != [PAREN] in
# left: x LIKE ?
# right: (x != ? OR x >= ?)
#
# BIND values differ
#      got: [
#           'x%',
#           {
#             '>=' => 2,
#             '!=' => 1
#           }
#         ]
# expected: [
#           '1',
#           '2',
#           'x%'
#         ]
t/04modifiers......ok
        4/116 unexpectedly succeeded
t/06order_by.......ok
t/07subqueries.....ok
t/08special_ops....ok
t/09refkind........ok
t/10test...........ok
All tests successful (4 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED).
Files=10, Tests=1998, 10 wallclock secs ( 7.57 cusr +  0.43 csys =  8.00 CPU)
----------------------------------------------------8<----------------------------------------------------------------

The test summary says all test successful, but the output is saying something different, isn't it?
I don't know if I have to be concerned about that output.

Hopefully someone can clarify.

Best regards
Andreas