[Dbix-class] BUG? Unable to resolve relationship

Ovid publiustemp-dbic at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 11 15:34:48 GMT 2009

--- On Fri, 11/12/09, Rob Kinyon <rob.kinyon at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Rob Kinyon <rob.kinyon at gmail.com>

> This looks to be the mythical "might_belong_to"
> relationship type that
> hasn't been defined yet. might_have is the LEFT JOIN
> version of
> has_many. What you want is belongs_to( ..., { join_type
> => 'LEFT' } );

>From DBIx::Class::RelationShip:


  Arguments: $accessor_name, $related_class, $their_fk_column|\%cond|\@cond?, \%attrs?
  Creates an optional one-to-one relationship with a class. 

That "one-to-one" is wrong?  Is this a doc error?  Ironically, our original code had "belongs_to", but it seemed a bit odd and was throwing the same error, so I changed it to "might_have" since (customer "might_have" account seemed natural).  

In the sample code I sent, changing "might_have" to "belongs_to" results in the same error:

The::Schema::Customer::account(): Unable to resolve relationship from Customer to account: column account.account_id not loaded from storage (or not passed to new() prior to insert()). Maybe you forgot to call ->discard_changes to get defaults from the db. at loader.pl line 37

Buy the book         - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Tech blog            - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
Twitter              - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl
Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6

More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list