[Dbix-class] (no subject)
Dami Laurent (PJ)
laurent.dami at justice.ge.ch
Mon Jul 2 07:33:38 GMT 2012
Hi DBIC list,
For info, I gave a talk at the French Perl Workshop 2012
about comparing DBIx::Class (DBIC) and DBIx::DataModel (DBIDM);
at this occasion I did a few benchmarks that may be worth sharing
with you :
Extract & print 2 columns from a single table (109349 rows)
- raw DBI 0.43 secs
- DBIC regular 11.09 secs
- DBIC hashref inflator 10.06 secs
- DBIC 'raw data' (cursor) 4.48 secs
- DBIDM regular 4.00 secs
- DBIDM fast statement 2.25 secs
Join 3 tables & print 4 columns from the join (113895 rows)
- raw DBI 1.36 secs
- DBIC regular 46.70 secs
- DBIC, join & +columns 15.50 secs
- DBIC, join & +columns, hashref inflator 14.17 secs
- DBIC, join & +columns, 'raw data' (cursor) 6.59 secs
- DBIC, prefetch 146.29 secs
- DBIDM regular 5.01 secs
- DBIDM fast statement 3.28 secs
I was not surprised to find out that DBIC is slower
than DBIDM :-) ; however, I was quite surprised to
find out that, among DBIC mechanisms :
a) 'HashRefInflator', often advocated as being the fast way to get
data from DBIC, actually doesn't seem to bring any significant
benefit.
b) 'prefetch', also advocated for doing speed improvements, indeed
does its job of sparing queries to the database, but then has
such a high cost in handling the retrieved data that it becomes
the most expensive method.
c) 'cursor', which goes directly to the DBI layer and therefore
loses all ORM features for the retrieved data, nevertheless
adds a significant cost over raw DBI.
Since I'm not an expert of DBIC, I may well have done something wrong
in those benchmarks; so please correct me if necessary.
The source code is at https://github.com/damil/compare-ORM
The FPW12 talk also discussed various design aspects; the slides are at
http://www.slideshare.net/ldami/dbixclass-vs-dbixdatamodel.
Best regards, Laurent Dami
More information about the DBIx-Class
mailing list