[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion
Paul Mooney
paul.mooney at phymatics.co.uk
Wed Nov 2 09:07:36 GMT 2016
On 02.11.2016 09:02, Dave Cross wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Zeichmann <matthias.zeichmann at gmail.com>:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Charlie Garrison
>> <garrison at zeta.org.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2016, at 19:48, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think a fork will not work. The "old" DBIC will stagnate, the "new"
>>> > will not gain traction. Everybody loses.
>>>
>>> Agreed. Another,
>>>
>>
>> same here
>>
>> -1 for forking, +1 for the original proposal
>
> Mee too.
>
> +1 Matt's proposal (new project team)
> -1 Andrew's proposal (forking)
Same here:
+1 Matt's proposal
-1 to forking
More information about the DBIx-Class
mailing list