[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

Paul Mooney paul.mooney at phymatics.co.uk
Wed Nov 2 09:07:36 GMT 2016


On 02.11.2016 09:02, Dave Cross wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Zeichmann <matthias.zeichmann at gmail.com>:
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Charlie Garrison 
>> <garrison at zeta.org.au>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1 Nov 2016, at 19:48, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>> 
>>> > I think a fork will not work. The "old" DBIC will stagnate, the "new"
>>> > will not gain traction. Everybody loses.
>>> 
>>> Agreed. Another,
>>> 
>> 
>> same here
>> 
>> -1 for forking, +1 for the original proposal
> 
> Mee too.
> 
> +1 Matt's proposal (new project team)
> -1 Andrew's proposal (forking)

Same here:

+1 Matt's proposal
-1 to forking




More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list