[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

Stefan Hornburg (Racke) racke at linuxia.de
Wed Nov 2 12:56:57 GMT 2016


On 11/02/2016 10:11 AM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 10:07 AM, Paul Mooney wrote:
>> On 02.11.2016 09:02, Dave Cross wrote:
>>> Quoting Matthias Zeichmann <matthias.zeichmann at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Charlie Garrison <garrison at zeta.org.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2016, at 19:48, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think a fork will not work. The "old" DBIC will stagnate, the "new"
>>>>>> will not gain traction. Everybody loses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. Another,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> same here
>>>>
>>>> -1 for forking, +1 for the original proposal
>>>
>>> Mee too.
>>>
>>> +1 Matt's proposal (new project team)
>>> -1 Andrew's proposal (forking)
>>
>> Same here:
>>
>> +1 Matt's proposal
>> -1 to forking
>>
> 
> +1 Matt's proposal
> +1 to forking
> 

Sorry, the choices were confused by me - so my corrected vote is

+1 Matt's proposal (new project team)
-1 to forking

Regards
          Racke


-- 
Ecommerce and Linux consulting + Perl and web application programming.
Debian and Sympa administration.




More information about the DBIx-Class mailing list