[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: An actually concrete proposal w/bootstrap governance system

[Darren Duncan]

On 2016-10-18 9:51 AM, Matt S Trout wrote:
> What say ye?

I don't have much to add that hasn't been said by others.

Assuming that "modifying the rules" includes "modifying the list of voting 
members" ...

+1

I agree that it would be good to get this document into the repository and use 
it as a starting point for a more official governance.

That should help prevent or unstick some analysis paralysis, as it would give a 
reasonably safe starting place, where uncontroversial things have been 
formalized, and anything needing changing about governance can be changed 
without holding up the other stuff.

As an initial followup, I propose talking with the remainder of Peter's EXAMPLE 
preferred core team, those not also in Matt's list, namely HAARG and SYSPETE in 
that order, and see if they would be interested in being Voting Members.

-- Darren Duncan